Republican "Southern Strategy" Moves North

To my friends up north, including a lot of relatives in Wisconsin where my wife was born, and in Indiana and Ohio and out West too, in Arizona: If you want to know where Nixon’s cynical “Southern Strategy”—baptizing racists into the Republican Party in the 1970s—is leading you—today, in 2011—read Intelligence Report, an award-winning periodical published by the famous nemesis of the Klu Klux Klan, Morris Dees and The Southern Poverty Law Center.

When Barack Obama became a presidential candidate, an explosive resurgence of Klan successors cast a sudden burden of revolutionary proportions on the Secret Service, the FBI, and on state and local police departments. According to SPLC’s latest ”Hate Map,” more than one thousand fast growing groups of armed racist militias—221 named “Klu Klux Klan;” 170, “Neo-Nazi;” 136, “White Nationalist;” another 136, “Racist Skinhead;” and 42 “Neo-Confederate.” An additional 824 violently anti-government hate groups call themselves “Patriots” or “Sovereign Citizen” organizations; and, yes, with the same blind irony, 26 of them are called “Christian Identity.”

These armed insurgencies now threaten, not only in the south, as northerners might think, but in all but two of the States of the Union. For example, there are 8 hate groups in Wisconsin, 24 in Indiana, 32 in Ohio and 22 in Arizona. Their sordid criminal activities make “Watergate” look like a girl scout sleep over. Check out SPLC’s names and addressees in your own state and neighborhood.

In the course of Barack Obama’s presidential campaign, racial epithets became commonplace at political rallies. The GOP, the Party of Lincoln, and its Presidential candidate denied responsibility, and I have every reason to believe them.

My fellow southerner, Carlos Dews, distinguished author and Chairman of the Department of English Literature at John Cabot University in Rome, explained in the December 2009 issue of Aspenia, an Italian journal, reprinted in the Philadelphia Inquirer, how racists in the United States have learned one lesson since the 1960s: They cannot express their racism directly. In public, they must veil their racial hatred behind policy differences. “But I know what they mean when they say they ‘want their country back.’ They want it back safely in the exclusive hands of people exactly like themselves.”

But we live in a country of excitingly different kinds of people from every corner of the earth; of every shape, size, sex, age, appearance, language, and color; of an endless variety of religious, social, political persuasions and affiliations; all kinds of tastes, talents, interests, and skills; some smart and thoughtful; others stupid and unthinking; some healthy and whole, others sick, lame and disabled; strong and weak; rich and poor.

Absolutists here and in other parts of the world think such a diverse country as ours is ungovernable absent a strong, coercive state that disdains both the truth and the rights of its people.

I’ll take this up next in my continuing series on

“The Poisonous Fruit of the Republican Party's 'Southern Strategy' as it Moves North,”

or, “I’m not prejudiced, but. . . .”

photo credit: flickr Bob Jagendorf

The Approaching Republican Armageddon

The last flood of secret Republican political spending produced Watergate; the current deluge may have more violent, lasting consequences.

E.J. Dionne Jr. reports in the Washington Post of October 18, 2010 that Republican “outside groups that refuse to disclose their donor lists. . . are doing the dirty work of pounding their Democratic opponents in commercials for which no one is accountable. The Republican candidates can shrug an innocent ‘Who, me?’ Deniability is a wonderful thing."

And then, on the far right, Glenn Beck and his allies cast President Obama as the central figure in a conspiracy against America itself, fueling participation by the most extreme 10 percent or 15 percent of the electorate.

Their crackpot ideas, as the historian Sean Wilentz documented in the New Yorker recently, originated in the 1950s and '60s, in the paranoid theorizing of the John Birch Society. But whereas responsible conservatives such as William F. Buckley Jr. denounced the Birchers and the rest of the lunatic fringe back then, Republicans this time are riding the radical wave. . . .

Frank Rich reports in The New York Times on October 17, 2010, under the title “The Rage Won’t End on Election Day,” that the current “wave of anger began with the parallel 2008 cataclysms of the economy’s collapse and Barack Obama’s ascension.”

The economic meltdown precipitated by forty years of financial deregulation and tax avoidance borrowing threatened the illusory security of Middle Class America; the election of President Obama stirred the sleeping violence of what we hoped was long dead racism. Republicans fired these twin frustrations with lies and cash to distract attention from culpably risky GOP financial adventurism.

The immediate consequence, as Rich points out, was a report in the Boston Globe last fall “that the Secret Service was overwhelmed by the death threats against the president as well as a rise in hate groups and anti-government fervor. In a cover article last month, Barton Gellman wrote in Time that the magazine’s six month investigation found that ‘the threat level against the president and other government targets” is at its highest since the anti-government frenzy that preceded Timothy McVeigh’s bombing of a federal building in Oklahoma City in 1995.”

The ugly names Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and other Democrats have endured and that’s a mark of how well they’ve done their jobs in the face of bought and paid for vilification and do-nothing, filibustering opponents. Mr. Dionne’s report concludes that Republican candidates “can be calmly affable, knowing they have behind them oodles of secret cash and a far right that sees Nov. 2 as Armageddon.”

If you want a close-up up of current rehearsals for the approaching Republican- managed Armageddon—the thousands of violent participants and hate groups, their sordid criminal activities, and their connections with Fox News, read Intelligence Report, a monthly periodical published by the famous nemesis of the Ku Klux Klan, The Southern Poverty Law Center, now battling a gigantic resurgence of Klan successors.

Democratic voters must not be discouraged by what a gullible media reports as the “enthusiasm” of Republican voters (all bought and paid for).

You didn’t make any mistakes in 2008, and you’re going to do a grand encore November 2, 2010 and save us, once again, from secret, bigoted Republican money.

photo: flickr, bobster855, Harvey Comics

To Fenn Little, candidate for U.S. House of Representatives, Atlanta GA

Dear Mr. Little:

Thanks for the opportunity you offer me, as a fellow Washington and Lee University alumnus, to help "send the traditions of character, excellence and commitment we developed at W&L to the U.S. House."

December 7, 1941, some forty-three years before you graduated, I was a freshman at W&L, relaxing at my fraternity (Lambda Chi Alpha) after a big party the night before, when we learned of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The next day, half of the student body enlisted in the Army, Navy or Marines. These early volunteers suffered enormous casualties, especially in the Pacific. We freshmen enlisted months later as we came of age; but, W&L being a very friendly, sociable school, I knew most of the early enlistees quite well. You are right, therefore, in praising W&L "character, excellence and commitment."

Without suggesting that you lack any of these qualities, my question to you is why you think your opponent, John Lewis, is so lacking in these qualities as to recommend your replacing him In the United States House of Representatives.

John Lewis' character and commitment have been painfully tested. You acknowledge his "success" as a Civil Rights leader but fail to notice how John Lewis, no less than our fellow W&L enlistees, risked his life, and very nearly lost it, in terrifying battles against powerful, vicious enemies of our nation.

You also fail to notice that the struggle against oppressive violence is far from over, especially in the South. As William Faulkner put it, "The past is never dead, it's not even past."

The Republican party has chosen since Nixon a "southern strategy" that very effectively converted Democratic bigots into Republican bigots, and made the word "liberal" a code word for "N——lovers." If John Lewis sinned in voting, like the Democratic party's leader, the hated "liberal," Nancy Pelosi, "99.8% of the time," would you, Mr. Little, join the ''no" block of Republicans who seek to turn the clock back and reinstall a long discredited racist, sexist oligarchy?

Recalling W&L tradition, and the Virginia society I grew up in, I hasten to add, that apart from opportunist politicians, I never heard blacks spoken of disrespectfully until I went north to Philadelphia after the war to complete my education at the University of Pennsylvania.

I am proud of my Southern heritage (the famous novelist and Southern historian, Clifford Dowdey is a relative); but I am fearful, like Morris Dees of the Southern Poverty Law Center, that people like you, Mr. Little, are enablers providing respectable encouragement to a growing group of armed racist militias and other violent rightist hate groups. I don't have any idea of what things were like at W&L during the Reagan years when you were there, but I'm proud of W&L when I see at alumni meetings here in Atlanta the enthusiasm with which recent black and female graduates have embraced the "Southern Gentleman" tradition we inherited from our once president, Robert E. Lee.

Fraternally,

LANDON DOWDEY

P.S. Another Southern friend of mine, Carlos Dews, an author, professor and chairman of the Department of English Language and Literature at John Cabot University in Rome recently wrote in the December 2009 issue of Aspenia, an Italian journal, and reprinted in the Philadelphia Inquirer

“Unfortunately, racists in the United States have learned one valuable lesson since the 1960s: They cannot express their racism directly. In public, they must veil their racial hatred behind policy differences. . . . But I know what [they] mean when they say . . . they "want their country back." They want it back, safely, in the hands of someone like them, a white person. They feel that a black man has no right to be the president of their country.”

photo: Mr. Fenn Little, courtesy, Fenn Little for Congress